UKIP

New Venue for Peterborough Branch Meetings >>> Police Patrols afraid of the dark in Wisbech >>> Robert on Radio talking about the RAF Upwood derelict site >>> WHATEVER IT TAKES ... Terence D. Burch needs and deserves better treatment from the NHS." says, Robert H. Brown NW Cambs Branch of UKIP >>> Robert H Brown now serves on UKIP's Disciplinary Panel >>> A referendum on a new voting system could break apart Britain´s coalition government by the end of May 2011 and still leave us with an unrepresentative parliament, according to UKIP´s David Campbell Bannerman. >>> A quarter of London´s tramps are from EU countries and the number of homeless immigrants is rising, according to new data from the charity, Broadway. >>> Key points of Foreign Secretary William Hague´s speech on Britain´s Foreign Policy in a Networked World have been rebutted by UKIP´s Leading Spokesman, Nigel Farage MEP. >>> British husbands should beware, UKIP MEP Mike Nattrass has warned this week, after French MPs unanimously approved a new bill which could see people jailed for being rude to their partners. >>>
 
UKIP NW Cambs Homepage
Local UKIP Candidates
UKIP Homepage
UKIP NW Cambs News
UKIP NW Cambs Events
UKIP in Europe
UKIP Eastern Counties
UKIP NW Cambs Links
UKIP NW Cambs Photos
UKIP Young Independence
UKIP Manifesto
UKIP Homepage
UKIP Branches in Cambridgeshire
UKIP Contact Us
UKIP NW Cambs Join
UKIP NW Cambs Councillors
UKIP NW Cambs Campaigns
UKIP NW Cambs Letters
UKIP What the EU Costs Us
UKIP NW Cambs Articles
UKIP NW Cambs Archives
Why UKIP
UKIP NW Cambs Videos
Our Shop
 
NWCambs UKIP Blog Site
 
To Visit UKIPMEPS.ORG click on the banner above
 
Stuart Agnew johnstuart.agnew@europarl.europa.eu
Website
Europe of freedom and democracy Group Member

United Kingdom Independence Party

United Kingdom

Born on 30 August 1949, Norwich

 
David Campbell Bannerman david.campbellbannerman@europarl.europa.eu
Website
Europe of freedom and democracy Group Member

United Kingdom Independence Party

United Kingdom

Born on 28 May 1960, Bombay (India)

 
MEP calls for ‘skull & crossbones’ symbol to be stamped on illegal EU eggs
 
The European Commissioner for Agriculture, Dacian Ciolos has been on the receiving end of a major broadside from the East of England MEP Stuart Agnew (UKIP). The Commissioner was attending a debate (15.3.11) on the ‘Work Programme for 2012’ and was told in no uncertain terms that the EU needs to ‘get a grip’ on the serious problem of 83 million illegal eggs that will be produced on the very first day of 2012.

Mr Agnew told the Commissioner: “You will say to me that this is not my responsibility, it’s the Trade Commissioner or the Environment Commissioner. Somebody has got to get a grip on this. I don’t know who it is going to be but I should imagine you must be involved as egg production is a front-line agricultural activity.”

He advised the Commissioner that he had been doing some digging to find out what preparations are being made in the rest of Europe in advance of the ban on battery eggs and found that: “It is very much business as usual. The chick placements for 2010 have actually gone up, not down, which means that battery cage birds will be replaced with 16 week old poults. In other words, they (battery egg producers in other EU countries) are expecting to carry on after 1st January.”

“As you know, British producers have spent £400 million of their own money to comply with your regulations. They cannot be left standing like rabbits in the headlights while all these other egg producers carry on producing illegal eggs.”

Mr Agnew concluded his remarks to the Commissioner by suggesting that the EU uses its promotional budget to arrange for the illegal eggs to be “stamped with a nice symbol of the skull and crossbones, so that everyone knows where they are.”
 
Agnew continues to press the European Commission over the battery cage ban
 
The East of England MEP and farmer, Stuart Agnew has continued with his campaign to get the European Commission to understand the full implications of its decision to ban battery cage produced eggs from 1st January 2012. He has today (15th March) submitted a new draft of written questions to the Commission which highlight the lack of preparation for the ban in most member states and a similar lack of interest on the part of the Commission in monitoring the situation and in preparing to enforce the ban.

Mr Agnew said: "It is quite evident that it is business as usual in many of the EU member states. There is virtually no sign of any decrease in the orders for chick replacements destined for battery cage units and, in some cases, they are increasing. If there was any serious intention to meet the deadline for the ban, we ought to be seeing quite significant decreases. I am also seriously concerned about the lack of preparation by the Commission both in terms of monitoring what is going on in the relevant member states and in making plans for the enforcement of the ban. I do not believe that the Commission has ever taken the issue of 83 million eggs per day suddenly becoming illegal on 1st January 2012 at all seriously, despite my regularly raising these issues in the European Parliament's Agriculture Committee and in plenary sessions of the Parliament.

"Unfortunately, the Commission prefers the terribly complacent 'it will be alright on the night' approach rather than think about how this vast amount of eggs, together with the birds that produce them are going to be disposed of sensibly and humanely. I believe that countries such as the UK, where there has been extensive preparatory investment in alternative egg production systems, are going to end up being unfairly penalised by having to compete against countries that are still exporting cheaply produced battery eggs".

The full list of Mr Agnew's written questions to the European Commission is as follows:

To ask the Commission whether it is aware that the rearers of egg-laying hens across the EU are ordering chick placements in numbers which are similar to or an increase upon last year?

Has the Commission undertaken any work to assess the use of pullets - in the context of the fact that unless alternative systems are available these pullets can only be used to stock battery cages?

What plans does the Commission have to monitor and enforce the battery cage ban which comes into effect on 1 January 2012?

Bearing in mind the 17 month lead times, has the Commission yet begun to draw conclusions about the enforcement of the battery cage ban which comes into effect on 1 January 2012 - and, if not, when will it?
 
EASTERN MEP CALLS FOR CAP SUBSIDIES TO GO TO ACTIVE FARMERS, NOT LANDOWNERS
 
During a debate in the European Parliament’s Agriculture Committee on policy challenges for the EU after 2013 (28.2.11), UKIP’s East of England MEP, Stuart Agnew has called for an end to the single farm payment “slowly but surely slipping away from active farmers, who take the risks in the business.”

“It is slowly racking up to landowners, who are not necessarily active farmers and it is something that will go on and on unless it is corrected.”

Mr Agnew also said: “The other big challenge you’ve got is to try and ensure that Pillar 2 money is spent sensibly and is not wasted on some of the stupid schemes that I have highlighted here before.”

The full speech can be viewed by clicking here
 
Parliament has been urged to "sort out" its security arrangements after another alleged breach of security. Nigel Farage
 
The latest incident is believed to have happened last week when a French stagiaire, said to be on the run from Belgian police for issuing death threats to colleagues by email, allegedly obtained a new security badge from parliament's accreditation.

A well-placed parliament source said his former stagiaire colleagues were even given an extra security guard for protection after he apparently slipped through the applications net and entered parliament by claiming he was disabled.

The senior source said the man, who had been sacked earlier in the week, was hunted through the buildings and arrested by police on parliament’s premises a short time later.

The incident comes after a recent armed robbery at a postal office in parliament in which several thousand euros were stolen and another security scare during the visit of Prince Charles when a French journalist managed to smuggle a fake gun into parliament.

Responding to the latest scare, Ukip leader Nigel Farage said, "Security in the European parliament is a farce.

"We have had armed robberies, people wandering around getting close to dignitaries with fake weapons and now we have someone dangerously disturbed. Sooner or later somebody is going to get badly hurt.

"Are the parliamentary authorities going to wait until we have a situation like Stephen Timms in London [who was stabbed during a constituency surgery] before they act?

"I know it is hard to believe but the European parliament, particularly since the Lisbon treaty is becoming more and more influential.

"Discussions that can make or break companies and impact upon tens of thousands of jobs are made here.

"Those who lose, and to be honest there are millions of people in the EU who have lost due to decisions made in this place, are apt to get angry.

"It just takes one person with a grievance, whether legitimate or not and there could be an emergency.

"The parliament has to sort out its security and fast before something awful happens."

Parliament remained tight-lipped on the alleged incident but a press office source said, "We don't know if he was arrested.

"We only know that he was here last week receiving treatment by our medical service and that he is not a parliament trainee anymore."
 
EASTERN COUNTIES MEP ACCUSES EU OF FORCING UP FARMING COSTS
 
In a speech to the European Parliament today (16.2.11) in Strasbourg during a debate on rising food prices, the East of England MEP, Stuart Agnew, who owns a farm in Norfolk, has accused the EU of contradictory policies which create major increases in costs for British farmers.

Mr Agnew painted a bleak picture of life at the farm gate. “Whilst food prices are undoubtedly rising, the situation at the farm gate is very different”. He explained that farmers in many sectors including pig meat, beef, sheep meat and eggs were seeing a drop in the value of their produce, while their costs are rising steeply. Other sector prices are either unchanged or showing only marginal increases in produce prices. He said that many of them “cannot sustain the status quo for more than a few months. They will either succeed in claiming higher prices from the retailers or they will cease production.”

“What is the EU doing about this? Well, they are making it unnecessarily expensive to import non-GM soya beans. They are charging farmers a global warming levy on their electricity bills, whilst many of those same farmers have lost thousands of tonnes of sugar beet and potatoes in the ground due to very cold weather!”

He also questioned the EU’s policy of increasing public subsidy of organic farming, “….rather than allowing this sector to be consumer led. Any switching of conventional production systems to organic will lead to a reduction in food supplies.”

The full speech can be viewed by clicking here
 
NORFOLK’S MEP FARMER QUESTIONS NFU PRESIDENT’S
OBSESSION WITH GLOBAL WARMING ‘RED HERRING’
 
In his opening address to the Annual Conference of the National Farmers Union in Birmingham yesterday (15th February 2011), NFU President Peter Kendall was keen to stress the dangers of global warming.

Stuart Agnew MEP (UKIP), a Norfolk farmer himself, has hit back. Mr Agnew pointed out: “In the audience there would have been many sugar beet growers looking at the worst frost damage to their crop that they have ever experienced, resulting in huge financial losses. I urge Peter to forget all about Al Gore and his sensational film. It may have made lots of money for Mr Gore, but it is a complete red herring to the farming industry.”

Mr Agnew was also scathing about the NFU’s reliance on the EU to sort out the problems in the milk sector: “Relying on the European Commission to solve the problems in the milk sector will only make matters worse. A lawyer’s paradise lies ahead with disputes tied up in European Courts for years on end. The best institution to deal with errant British retailers is our elected British Government passing enforceable laws.”
 
ECHR is a Requirement of EU Membership
 
There has been a concerted effort by the political establishment to maintain that the UK’s signature to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is a quite separate subject to our membership of the European Union. This is happening because they want us to believe that allowing prisoners the vote is not connected to EU membership, but to the ECHR.

In fact the two are joined together by two distinct bonds:

1) In addition to being members of the EU, the UK is also a member of an organisation called the Council of Europe, which has a membership of about fifty countries, (several of which are not in continental Europe). Membership of the Council of Europe is dependent upon being signed up to the ECHR and, if the UK withdrew its signature from the ECHR, we would be obliged to leave the Council of Europe. However no country can be a member of the EU unless it is already a member of the Council of Europe. Therefore, if we wish to withdraw our signature from the ECHR we MUST leave the EU.

2) Under Article 6 of The Treaty of the European Union, (This is the Treaty that consolidates all the treaties) once the Lisbon Treaty was signed, we have given the EU the power to decide on our behalf whether or not we remain signatories to the ECHR. This power will formally be put in place later this year. A process we cannot prevent.
 
MEP FURY AT NIMROD SCRAPPING
 
As television news pictures of the Nimrod being taken apart hit our screens, UKIP MEP David Campbell Bannerman has accused the coalition of putting money before our country’s defence needs.
He said: “As the world becomes more uncertain and dangerous everyday, this government seems hell-bent on reducing our independent military capability in favour of increasing our reliability on our present allies, just so they can save a few quid.
“The same day they say they are keeping a watered down version of control orders in order to defend our country, they are ripping apart a vital component in defending ourselves from overseas threats.
“In the last couple of years the Russians have resumed the probing of our defences by sea and air, so Nimrods are needed now, more than ever.
“Surely the modest cost of moth-balling the Nimrods, rather than scrapping them, would have been a small price to pay to insure our country’s vital defence needs are met.
“With the economy now clearly stalling. We need more of the sort of high-tec UK-based jobs defence orders provide, not less.
“The Government’s actions may save some money in the short term, but in the long term losing our sovereignty and being beholden to our allies could cost us very dear indeed.”

Ashton takes full advantage of EU tax loophole. EU Foreign Minister Baroness Catherine Ashton pays a reduced EU tax rate on her earnings, even though she remains a British resident, unlike most other EU officials. While the reduced rates are automatic, EU officials can choose to pay national tax rates, giving the difference to the Exchequer in their home country. However, most of them – including Ashton – do not. (Telegraph, 23 January)

MEPs employing family members kept secret. Around 20 MEPs are still employing family members as assistants. The practice was forbidden in July 2009; however re-elected MEPs, who previously employed family, were allowed to keep on doing so until 2014. European Parliament Secretary-General Klaus Welle has refused to disclose details of the MEPs to “protect the confidentiality of personal data”. (EUobserver, 20 January)

Trust in EU at all time low in Germany. A poll conducted by the Allensbach Institute showed that German citizens’ trust in the EU has fallen to an all-time low. 63% of respondents said they have "little or no trust" in the EU, up from 51% in March 2010. 68% said they have “little or no trust” in the single currency. Only 4% could correctly answer the question: “Who is Herman Van Rompuy?” (FAZ, 26 January)

 
UK owes EU £1 billion in fines. The National Audit Office has set aside around £601 million to pay future EU fines, in addition to £398 million of fines already paid, due to mismanagement of EU funds spent in the UK. Most of the fines relate to EU farm subsidy payments and some to the EU’s regional funds. Meanwhile, under the Government’s proposed Localism Bill, Councils could be made liable for another set of fines resulting from new EU directives covering waste recycling, procurement and service delivery. Missed targets could see fines in excess of £1 billion levied against the UK, the Local Government Authority warned. (FT, 20 January; Telegraph, 19 January)
 
STUART AGNEW MEP CLASHES WITH BELGIAN
 
MINISTER OVER CLIMATE CHANGE ‘HOAX’ THAT HAS
 
HIT BRITISH SUGAR BEET GROWERS ‘VERY HARD’
 
The East of England MEP, Stuart Agnew (UKIP) has clashed with the Belgian Minister for Small Businesses and Agriculture, Sabine Laruelle, during a debate in the European Parliament’s Agriculture & Rural Development Committee today (26.1.11). The Committee was discussing the future of Agriculture and the Minister brought up the subject of climate change.

Mr Agnew said: Those two dreaded words are like a red rag to a bull to me. He went on to describe the situation in the East of England for sugar beet growers. As I speak, there are thousands of acres of sugar beet that are not fit to process because of severe cold weather. He blamed this situation on British Sugar’s decision to lengthen the sugar beet campaign because they became “convinced by all the propaganda about global warming”. He strongly urged the Committee to stop the propaganda because it causes situations like this in which everybody has really been hit hard.

Mr Agnew suggested that the best method for cooling the climate was to keep holding climate change conferences because each one is followed by a spell of very cold weather.

He concluded by saying that the EU does not need to regulate farmers on this issue at all.

To view Mr Agnew’s full speech,
CLICK HERE:
 
16th December 2010
 
AGNEW TELLS COMMISSION SOME HOME TRUTHS ABOUT THE 2012 BATTERY CAGE BAN
 
The East of England MEP, Stuart Agnew (UKIP), in a speech to the European Parliament in Strasbourg today (16.12.10) has been giving the European Commission some brutal home truths about its ban on battery cages for laying hens, which is due to come into force on 1.1.2012 but for which many member states will be patently unprepared. He accused the Commission of “creating a huge crisis in the egg industry” and demanded to know how 83 million (per day) surplus battery cage produced eggs and over 100 million hens could be removed and disposed of in 24 hours.

Even if this could be done, Mr Agnew wanted to know where consumers would find replacements for the 83 million daily eggs taken out of the market. “To Ukraine, to India, to Argentina, to Brazil, where all the eggs will have been laid in battery cages. Do any of these countries have a reputation for above average bird welfare standards? Once this trade starts, it will expand rapidly by virtue of its competitive advantage. It will be very difficult to stop and it will completely undermine the efforts of colony egg producers in the UK. In effect we will export a large slice of our industry, an industry that has just made a massive investment to stay compliant with EU rules.”

Mr Agnew called for non-compliant member states to be given temporary derogations on the condition that they “spend their regional funds on (egg) stamping machines and also to pay for an inspectorate whose staff are from compliant member states.” He described this as “the least worst solution” to the crisis created by the Commission.

Most UK retailers are keen to avoid trading in battery cage eggs after the deadline, but they can only succeed in this, if these eggs are properly identified.”

The full text of Mr Agnew’s speech is below and a video of it can be viewed at:

http://www.youtube.com/user/UKIPmeps?feature=mhum#p/u/0/EttfeXoEfBs

Welfare of Laying Hens Debate, Strasbourg 16.12.10

President,

The commission has created a huge crisis in the egg industry.

Like it or not 100 million birds will be in cages on D Day. There is neither the cash nor the logistics to prevent this.

The insistence on the ruthless enforcement of its rules in a year’s time, from the benefit of an armchair, may give the speaker concerned a great feeling of satisfaction but it could seriously jeopardise the long term health of the British egg sector.

Let’s look at the practical implications.

- how do you remove and dispose of 100 million hens in 24 hours ? -

Or - how do you safely smash and dispose of 83 million eggs each day ?

On the assumption that you somehow succeed in either of these.....

Where will the consumer turn for their 83 million daily eggs ?

To Ukraine, to India, to Argentina, to Brazil? Where all the eggs will have been laid in battery cages. Do any of these countries have a reputation for above average bird welfare standards?

Once this trade starts, it will expand rapidly by virtue of its competitive advantage.

It will be very difficult to stop.

It will completely undermine the efforts of colony egg producers in the UK. In effect we will export a large slice of our industry, an industry that has just made a massive investment to stay compliant with EU rules.

I believe that an intra-community trade ban is a complete non-starter. Not only will it be impossible to police across open borders, but it could be challenged by the WTO.

So, the least bad solution is to allow temporary derogations to non-compliant producers with conditions attached.

There are some naked images I enjoy looking at; but I do not enjoy the visual image of lorry loads of naked, unstamped eggs leaving foreign battery cage units en route to the UK in 2012.

Unstamped eggs are a gift to a fraudulent trader. We have learned this the hard way in the UK.

The UK solution is to mechanically stamp eggs with code numbers that represent their method of production at the laying farm itself. This operation is proceeding on my own farm at this very moment. The machinery is reliable.

The Commission say that it is far too difficult for them to organise the stamping of a special code number on non-compliant eggs, despite its obvious necessity.

Yet this is, of course, the same Commission that is forcing UK sheep farmers to unnecessarily identify sheep individually with unreliable electronic equipment. What a glaring inconsistency!

The least bad solution here is for the EU to insist that non-compliant member states spend their Regional funds on stamping machines and to also to pay for an inspectorate whose staff are nationals of compliant member states.

This inspectorate will also visit packing stations and build up a data base of the processors who use these battery cage eggs in their products.

Most UK retailers are keen to avoid trading in battery cage eggs after the deadline, but they can only succeed in this, if these eggs are properly identified.
 
Stuart Agnew MEP in the Farming Press
 
Anger at EU cage ban stance - Farming UK
At a recent meeting of the European Parliament's Agriculture and Rural Development Committee, UKIP MEP Stuart Agnew clashed with a European Commission ...
 

1. MEP 'offended' by member states' attempt to reduce EU budget increase

MEPs have reacted angrily to national governments' attempts to halt a proposed 5.9% increase to the EU's 2011 budget. National ambassadors to the EU have agreed a draft budget for 2011 of €126.58 billion, which is €3.6bn less than the draft budget presented by the Commission in April. The member states' proposal would still mean that the EU's budget would increase by 2.8% next year compared to 2010's budget, but the Commission's proposal would represent a 5.9% increase.

Sidonia Jedrzejewska MEP, the EP's rapporteur on the budget, responded to national governments' offer by telling an EP committee that, "I take these cuts not only as a provocation but as an offence." Jedrzejewska suggested that plans to cut the budget for youth training programmes were "a slap in the face". (European Voice EurActiv France, 15 July)

The negotiations are set to be tough, with seven member states - Austria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK - opposing the compromise offer of a 2.8% increase, arguing that there should have been even deeper cuts to the Commission's proposal.

Meanwhile, figures published by the Commission reveal that, in the last three years, the EU has given out £400m in grants to 727 projects marked "confidential". A Commission spokeswoman defended the spending, saying, "This is a very small amount of money and I am sure there are reasons why this is confidential." (Express, 10 July)

Where details were available, some of the projects receiving funding included "The Flying Gorillas" dance troupe, who received £160,000 to perform "spectacular belching" and "smelly foot" jigs. In addition, nearly £147,000 has been spent on creating 736 postcards - one for each MEP in the European Parliament. Each cost the taxpayer £200. (Sun, 10 July)

 

2. Finance ministers agree to give EU financial supervisors power to bypass national regulators

EU finance ministers meeting this week reached a political agreement on the rules for the creation of a new pan-European system of supervision for the financial services industry, which could have a huge impact on the City of London. The deal will see three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) being set up and given the power to bypass national regulators, such as the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in the UK, and directly address financial institutions with binding decisions when an "emergency situation" occurs.

Although the UK was initially opposed to giving such powers to the European supervisors, it relented on this proposal. In exchange, national governments, rather than the Commission for example, will have the last word on what constitutes an "emergency situation" in which the ESAs can use their powers of direct supervision. However, crucially, it is not yet clear under what voting system member states will decide on this. (Telegraph FT, 14 July)

Speaking at an event held by Open Europe this week, Conservative MEP Kay Swinburne conceded that, under the current proposal, a vote on declaring an emergency situation is "likely to be [by] simple majority", meaning that the UK would have the same voting weight as all other member states, even those with very small financial sectors. (OE events, 12 July)

The European Parliament had been calling for all three ESAs to be housed in Frankfurt, but this was rejected by the UK, which insisted that the European Banking Authority (EBA) - the EU watchdog responsible for the banking sector - would be based in London. Further negotiations are now likely to take place at the end of August, or the beginning of September, with an extraordinary meeting of EU finance ministers to take place on 7 September to further hasten proceedings. (Reuters Italia Telegraph, 14 July; La Tribune, 15 July)

 

3. News in brief

EU officials retire on £60,000 a year leaving £1bn bill. The EU will this year spend almost £1 billion on pensions, giving the average retired official an income of around £60,000. The UK's contribution will be £135 million. The average annual pension pocketed by the 17,471 retired officials benefiting from the scheme is £57,194, but the highest ranking officials can expect pensions of over £102,000. In 2009, the average retirement age for EU officials was 60, falling to 58 for lower secretarial grades. In Britain, the Government is raising the retirement age from 65 to 66 by 2016. (Telegraph, 12 July)
 

Brussels fines UK £150m for failing to fly the EU flag at funded projects. The EU has fined Britain more than £150 million for failing to display the EU flag as part of EU funded projects. The fines relate to the £3.8 billion given to the UK by the European Regional Development Fund, which has strict rules on the display of the EU flag on any project accepting cash. (Mail Telegraph, 8 July)
 
EU anti-fraud office identifies €1.8bn open to fraud and irregularities. The EU's anti-fraud office Olaf's annual 2009 report notes that of its 133 investigations into cases of fraud, most concerned officials from the European Commission, the EU Parliament and EU agencies, as well as the Committee of the Regions, the Data Protection Supervisor, the EU Ombudsman and the European Investment Bank. The Olaf report identifies €1.8 billion in EU funding which was open to fraud and irregularities, which is €700 million more than in 2008. Structural Funds are thought to be most prone to abuse. (EUobserver Olaf report, 15 July)
 
15 MEPs check out of EP early and head to Seychelles. 15 MEPs have travelled to the Seychelles for a two-day ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly meeting, just a few weeks after the EP's so-called "external parliamentary activities" session - the week when MEPs are given the opportunity to attend such meetings - and in the last week before the EP breaks for a six-week summer recess. (The Parliament, 16 July).

EU fishing subsidies used to support illegal fishing. Data from EU sources suggest that a third of pirate drift-netters penalised in Italy in the past five years had previously received more than €12 million in EU funding to stop using the nets. (FT , 6 July)

4. Open Europe in the news

End the travelling circus between Brussels and Strasbourg

16 July Knack

Open Europe's Pieter Cleppe was quoted in Belgian magazine Knack in an article on the European Parliament's travelling circus between Brussels and Strasbourg, saying that he is in favour of abolishing the Brussels premises of the Parliament, and moving it completely to Strasbourg. He said he was in favour "of the theory which prefers to have different institutions at different locations. That's how the European Parliament avoids becoming a spokesbody for the European Commission."

British MEPs have worst European Parliament attendance record

16 July The Parliament 10 July Telegraph

An article in the Telegraph, reporting that the UK's 72 member delegation to the European Parliament had the worst attendance record of all 27 member states, quoted Open Europe's Stephen Booth, saying "British MEPs are paid an awful lot of money to defend the interests of UK voters in Europe but it's pretty difficult to do that if they don't turn up to vote. Helping to fight the general election campaign is all very well but MEPs' first duty is to make sure that EU laws coming out of the European Parliament are good for the UK." Stephen was also quoted in The Parliament magazine.

The Coalition must keep promise on referendum

13 July E!Sharp

Open Europe's Director Mats Persson was quoted in an E!Sharp article on the Coalition Government's performance so far, saying that "It would be counterproductive for the government not to keep its promise of a referendum after a transfer of powers [to the EU]...The biggest risk is that like Labour, the coalition government tells the domestic audience that nothing is happening in Brussels and dismisses any changes as a tidying-up exercise to avoid a referendum. That would store up massive problems for the future, antagonising Tory backbenchers and public opinion".

UK contributes £135 million to EU officials' pensions

13 July Express

Open Europe was quoted in the Express, commenting on research that found the UK contributes £135 million a year to EU officials' pensions. Open Europe called for immediate reform of the EU's pension scheme and said: "The outrageous cost of EU civil servants' pensions is completely unaffordable. Governments across Europe are making tough spending choices and workers are facing unemployment and salary cuts". 

European Commission has given out £400m in grants to "confidential" projects

10 July Sun Express

The Sun and the Express both reported on Open Europe's finding that, in the last three years, the European Commission has given out £400m in grants to 727 projects marked "confidential". Open Europe's Stephen Booth was quoted in the Sun saying, "Funding these projects would be pretty ridiculous at the best of times, but when the Government is talking about massive cuts, the EU's spending looks truly outrageous. How can the EU demand more cash when it's throwing £400million of taxpayers' money down a black hole?" He was also quoted in the Express.

Future treaty changes should repatriate powers

8 July American Spectator

Open Europe's Mats Persson was quoted by the American Spectator magazine arguing that any future EU treaty change should be used by David Cameron to repatriate powers to Britain.

'The EU after the euro crisis: superstate or disintegration?'

5 July Guardian: Hannan

Writing in the Guardian, Conservative MEP Daniel Hannan cited Open Europe's recent debate, "The EU after the euro crisis: superstate or disintegration?", and argued that trying to label critics of the European Union as xenophobes is a "handy way of sidestepping criticism".

 

  

Let's get these news items out to the British Public and show what really goes on behind closed doors. It's our money there spending ... it needs to be stopped. Let's get out of the EU once and for all ... it costs the British Taxpayer £45 million a day just to be a member of the European Union. WE CAN NOT AFFORD TO REMAIN IN THE EU ... LET'S GET OUR COUNTRY BACK
The Press Office of  The Lord Stoddart of Swindon
(Independent Labour)
News Release

6th July 2010

Government denies that the European Commission

is the economic government of the UK

In response to a written question from the independent Labour Peer, Lord Stoddart of Swindon, the Government has denied that the European Commission is the economic government of the UK (Lords 5.7.10). Responding for the Government, Lord Sassoon said: For all member states not in the euro area, including the UK, fiscal and monetary policy decisions remain a matter for national Governments. The denial follows a public statement from Commission President Jos Manuel Barroso, in which he claimed that the Commission is "the economic Government of Europe".

Lord Stoddart, commenting on the Governments response said: The Government may think that it is in charge but I believe it is deluding itself. We are already seeing attempts by the Commission to force the Government to clear future national budget proposals with them before discussing it with our Parliament at Westminster. Furthermore, the European Central Bank has just asked EU finance ministers to consider changing the Lisbon Treaty in order to impose automatic sanctions against those countries breaking EU budget rules. The UK would still be subject to such rules, regardless of our status as a non-eurozone country.

The full text of Lord Stoddarts written question and the response from the Government is below:

Hansard 5th July 2010

European Commission

Question

Asked by Lord Stoddart of Swindon

To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their response to the statement by European Union Commission President Jos Manuel Barroso that the Commission is "the economic Government of Europe".[HL569]

The Commercial Secretary to the Treasury (Lord Sassoon): For all member states not in the euro area, including the UK, fiscal and monetary policy decisions remain a matter for national Governments.

Designed and Search Engineered by SEO-Eastern.Com