MEP calls for ‘skull & crossbones’ symbol to be
stamped on illegal EU eggs
The European Commissioner for Agriculture, Dacian
Ciolos has been on the receiving end of a major broadside from the East of
England MEP Stuart Agnew (UKIP). The Commissioner was attending a debate
(15.3.11) on the ‘Work Programme for 2012’ and was told in no uncertain
terms that the EU needs to ‘get a grip’ on the serious problem of 83
million illegal eggs that will be produced on the very first day of 2012.
Mr Agnew told the Commissioner: “You will say to me that this is
not my responsibility, it’s the Trade Commissioner or the Environment
Commissioner. Somebody has got to get a grip on this. I don’t know who it
is going to be but I should imagine you must be involved as egg production
is a front-line agricultural activity.”
He advised the Commissioner
that he had been doing some digging to find out what preparations are
being made in the rest of Europe in advance of the ban on battery eggs and
found that: “It is very much business as usual. The chick placements for
2010 have actually gone up, not down, which means that battery cage birds
will be replaced with 16 week old poults. In other words, they (battery
egg producers in other EU countries) are expecting to carry on after 1st
January.”
“As you know, British producers have spent £400 million
of their own money to comply with your regulations. They cannot be left
standing like rabbits in the headlights while all these other egg
producers carry on producing illegal eggs.”
Mr Agnew concluded his
remarks to the Commissioner by suggesting that the EU uses its promotional
budget to arrange for the illegal eggs to be “stamped with a nice symbol
of the skull and crossbones, so that everyone knows where they are.”
Agnew continues to press the European Commission over the battery
cage ban
The East of England MEP and farmer, Stuart Agnew has continued with his
campaign to get the European Commission to understand the full
implications of its decision to ban battery cage produced eggs from 1st
January 2012. He has today (15th March) submitted a new draft of written
questions to the Commission which highlight the lack of preparation for
the ban in most member states and a similar lack of interest on the part
of the Commission in monitoring the situation and in preparing to enforce
the ban.
Mr Agnew said: "It is quite evident that it is business as
usual in many of the EU member states. There is virtually no sign of any
decrease in the orders for chick replacements destined for battery cage
units and, in some cases, they are increasing. If there was any serious
intention to meet the deadline for the ban, we ought to be seeing quite
significant decreases. I am also seriously concerned about the lack of
preparation by the Commission both in terms of monitoring what is going on
in the relevant member states and in making plans for the enforcement of
the ban. I do not believe that the Commission has ever taken the issue of
83 million eggs per day suddenly becoming illegal on 1st January 2012 at
all seriously, despite my regularly raising these issues in the European
Parliament's Agriculture Committee and in plenary sessions of the
Parliament.
"Unfortunately, the Commission prefers the terribly
complacent 'it will be alright on the night' approach rather than think
about how this vast amount of eggs, together with the birds that produce
them are going to be disposed of sensibly and humanely. I believe that
countries such as the UK, where there has been extensive preparatory
investment in alternative egg production systems, are going to end up
being unfairly penalised by having to compete against countries that are
still exporting cheaply produced battery eggs".
The full list of
Mr Agnew's written questions to the European Commission is as follows:
To ask the Commission whether it is aware that the rearers of
egg-laying hens across the EU are ordering chick placements in numbers
which are similar to or an increase upon last year?
Has the
Commission undertaken any work to assess the use of pullets - in the
context of the fact that unless alternative systems are available these
pullets can only be used to stock battery cages?
What plans does
the Commission have to monitor and enforce the battery cage ban which
comes into effect on 1 January 2012?
Bearing in mind the 17 month
lead times, has the Commission yet begun to draw conclusions about the
enforcement of the battery cage ban which comes into effect on 1 January
2012 - and, if not, when will it?
EASTERN MEP CALLS FOR CAP SUBSIDIES TO GO TO ACTIVE FARMERS, NOT LANDOWNERS
During a debate in the European Parliament’s Agriculture Committee on
policy challenges for the EU after 2013 (28.2.11), UKIP’s East of England
MEP, Stuart Agnew has called for an end to the single farm payment “slowly
but surely slipping away from active farmers, who take the risks in the
business.”
“It is slowly racking up to landowners, who are not
necessarily active farmers and it is something that will go on and on
unless it is corrected.”
Mr Agnew also said: “The other big
challenge you’ve got is to try and ensure that Pillar 2 money is spent
sensibly and is not wasted on some of the stupid schemes that I have
highlighted here before.”
Parliament has been urged to "sort out" its security arrangements
after another alleged breach of security. Nigel Farage
The latest incident is believed to have happened last week when a French
stagiaire, said to be on the run from Belgian police for issuing death
threats to colleagues by email, allegedly obtained a new security badge
from parliament's accreditation.
A well-placed parliament source
said his former stagiaire colleagues were even given an extra security
guard for protection after he apparently slipped through the applications
net and entered parliament by claiming he was disabled.
The senior
source said the man, who had been sacked earlier in the week, was hunted
through the buildings and arrested by police on parliament’s premises a
short time later.
The incident comes after a recent armed robbery
at a postal office in parliament in which several thousand euros were
stolen and another security scare during the visit of Prince Charles when
a French journalist managed to smuggle a fake gun into parliament.
Responding to the latest scare, Ukip leader Nigel Farage said, "Security
in the European parliament is a farce.
"We have had armed
robberies, people wandering around getting close to dignitaries with fake
weapons and now we have someone dangerously disturbed. Sooner or later
somebody is going to get badly hurt.
"Are the parliamentary
authorities going to wait until we have a situation like Stephen Timms in
London [who was stabbed during a constituency surgery] before they act?
"I know it is hard to believe but the European parliament,
particularly since the Lisbon treaty is becoming more and more
influential.
"Discussions that can make or break companies and
impact upon tens of thousands of jobs are made here.
"Those who
lose, and to be honest there are millions of people in the EU who have
lost due to decisions made in this place, are apt to get angry.
"It
just takes one person with a grievance, whether legitimate or not and
there could be an emergency.
"The parliament has to sort out its
security and fast before something awful happens."
Parliament
remained tight-lipped on the alleged incident but a press office source
said, "We don't know if he was arrested.
"We only know that he was
here last week receiving treatment by our medical service and that he is
not a parliament trainee anymore."
EASTERN COUNTIES MEP ACCUSES EU OF FORCING UP FARMING COSTS
In a speech to the European Parliament today (16.2.11) in Strasbourg
during a debate on rising food prices, the East of England MEP, Stuart
Agnew, who owns a farm in Norfolk, has accused the EU of contradictory
policies which create major increases in costs for British farmers.
Mr Agnew painted a bleak picture of life at the farm gate. “Whilst
food prices are undoubtedly rising, the situation at the farm gate is very
different”. He explained that farmers in many sectors including pig meat,
beef, sheep meat and eggs were seeing a drop in the value of their
produce, while their costs are rising steeply. Other sector prices are
either unchanged or showing only marginal increases in produce prices. He
said that many of them “cannot sustain the status quo for more than a few
months. They will either succeed in claiming higher prices from the
retailers or they will cease production.”
“What is the EU doing
about this? Well, they are making it unnecessarily expensive to import
non-GM soya beans. They are charging farmers a global warming levy on
their electricity bills, whilst many of those same farmers have lost
thousands of tonnes of sugar beet and potatoes in the ground due to very
cold weather!”
He also questioned the EU’s policy of increasing
public subsidy of organic farming, “….rather than allowing this sector to
be consumer led. Any switching of conventional production systems to
organic will lead to a reduction in food supplies.”
NORFOLK’S MEP FARMER QUESTIONS NFU
PRESIDENT’S OBSESSION WITH GLOBAL WARMING ‘RED
HERRING’
In his opening address to the Annual Conference of the National Farmers
Union in Birmingham yesterday (15th February 2011), NFU President Peter
Kendall was keen to stress the dangers of global warming.
Stuart
Agnew MEP (UKIP), a Norfolk farmer himself, has hit back. Mr Agnew pointed
out: “In the audience there would have been many sugar beet growers
looking at the worst frost damage to their crop that they have ever
experienced, resulting in huge financial losses. I urge Peter to forget
all about Al Gore and his sensational film. It may have made lots of money
for Mr Gore, but it is a complete red herring to the farming industry.”
Mr Agnew was also scathing about the NFU’s reliance on the EU to sort
out the problems in the milk sector: “Relying on the European Commission
to solve the problems in the milk sector will only make matters worse. A
lawyer’s paradise lies ahead with disputes tied up in European Courts for
years on end. The best institution to deal with errant British retailers
is our elected British Government passing enforceable laws.”
ECHR is a Requirement of EU Membership
There has been a concerted effort by the political establishment to
maintain that the UK’s signature to the European Convention on Human
Rights (ECHR) is a quite separate subject to our membership of the
European Union. This is happening because they want us to believe that
allowing prisoners the vote is not connected to EU membership, but to the
ECHR.
In fact the two are joined together by two distinct bonds:
1) In addition to being members of the EU, the UK is also a member of
an organisation called the Council of Europe, which has a membership of
about fifty countries, (several of which are not in continental Europe).
Membership of the Council of Europe is dependent upon being signed up to
the ECHR and, if the UK withdrew its signature from the ECHR, we would be
obliged to leave the Council of Europe. However no country can be a member
of the EU unless it is already a member of the Council of Europe.
Therefore, if we wish to withdraw our signature from the ECHR we MUST
leave the EU.
2) Under Article 6 of The Treaty of the European
Union, (This is the Treaty that consolidates all the treaties) once the
Lisbon Treaty was signed, we have given the EU the power to decide on our
behalf whether or not we remain signatories to the ECHR. This power will
formally be put in place later this year. A process we cannot prevent.
MEP FURY AT NIMROD SCRAPPING
As television news pictures of the Nimrod being taken apart hit
our screens, UKIP MEP David Campbell Bannerman has accused the coalition
of putting money before our country’s defence needs. He said: “As the
world becomes more uncertain and dangerous everyday, this government seems
hell-bent on reducing our independent military capability in favour of
increasing our reliability on our present allies, just so they can save a
few quid. “The same day they say they are keeping a watered down
version of control orders in order to defend our country, they are ripping
apart a vital component in defending ourselves from overseas threats.
“In the last couple of years the Russians have resumed the probing of our
defences by sea and air, so Nimrods are needed now, more than ever.
“Surely the modest cost of moth-balling the Nimrods, rather than scrapping
them, would have been a small price to pay to insure our country’s vital
defence needs are met. “With the economy now clearly stalling. We need
more of the sort of high-tec UK-based jobs defence orders provide, not
less. “The Government’s actions may save some money in the short term,
but in the long term losing our sovereignty and being beholden to our
allies could cost us very dear indeed.”
Ashton takes full advantage of EU tax
loophole. EU Foreign Minister Baroness Catherine Ashton
pays a reduced EU tax rate on her earnings, even though she remains a
British resident, unlike most other EU officials. While the reduced rates
are automatic, EU officials can choose to pay national tax rates, giving
the difference to the Exchequer in their home country. However, most of
them – including Ashton – do not. (Telegraph,
23 January)
MEPs employing family members kept secret.
Around 20 MEPs are still employing family members as assistants. The
practice was forbidden in July 2009; however re-elected MEPs, who
previously employed family, were allowed to keep on doing so until 2014.
European Parliament Secretary-General Klaus Welle has refused to disclose
details of the MEPs to “protect the confidentiality of personal data”. (EUobserver, 20
January)
Trust in EU at all time low in Germany.
A poll conducted by the Allensbach Institute showed that German citizens’
trust in the EU has fallen to an all-time low. 63% of respondents said
they have "little or no trust" in the EU, up from 51% in March 2010. 68%
said they have “little or no trust” in the single currency. Only 4% could
correctly answer the question: “Who is Herman Van Rompuy?” (FAZ,
26 January)
UK owes EU £1 billion in fines. The National Audit Office
has set aside around £601 million to pay future EU fines, in addition to
£398 million of fines already paid, due to mismanagement of EU funds spent
in the UK. Most of the fines relate to EU farm subsidy payments and some
to the EU’s regional funds. Meanwhile, under the Government’s proposed
Localism Bill, Councils could be made liable for another set of fines
resulting from new EU directives covering waste recycling, procurement and
service delivery. Missed targets could see fines in excess of £1 billion
levied against the UK, the Local Government Authority warned. (FT, 20
January; Telegraph, 19 January)
STUART AGNEW MEP CLASHES WITH BELGIAN
MINISTER OVER CLIMATE CHANGE ‘HOAX’ THAT HAS
HIT BRITISH SUGAR BEET GROWERS ‘VERY HARD’
The East of England MEP, Stuart Agnew (UKIP) has
clashed with the Belgian Minister for Small Businesses and Agriculture,
Sabine Laruelle, during a debate in the European Parliament’s Agriculture
& Rural Development Committee today (26.1.11). The Committee was
discussing the future of Agriculture and the Minister brought up the
subject of climate change.
Mr Agnew said: Those two
dreaded words are like a red rag to a bull to me. He went on to describe
the situation in the East of England for sugar beet growers. As I speak,
there are thousands of acres of sugar beet that are not fit to process
because of severe cold weather. He blamed this situation on British
Sugar’s decision to lengthen the sugar beet campaign because they became
“convinced by all the propaganda about global warming”. He strongly urged
the Committee to stop the propaganda because it causes situations like
this in which everybody has really been hit hard.
Mr Agnew suggested that
the best method for cooling the climate was to keep holding climate change
conferences because each one is followed by a spell of very cold weather.
He concluded by saying
that the EU does not need to regulate farmers on this issue at all.
AGNEW TELLS COMMISSION SOME HOME TRUTHS ABOUT THE 2012 BATTERY
CAGE BAN
The East of England MEP, Stuart Agnew (UKIP), in a speech to the European
Parliament in Strasbourg today (16.12.10) has been giving the European
Commission some brutal home truths about its ban on battery cages for
laying hens, which is due to come into force on 1.1.2012 but for which
many member states will be patently unprepared. He accused the Commission
of “creating a huge crisis in the egg industry” and demanded to know how
83 million (per day) surplus battery cage produced eggs and over 100
million hens could be removed and disposed of in 24 hours.
Even if this could be done, Mr Agnew wanted to
know where consumers would find replacements for the 83 million daily eggs
taken out of the market. “To Ukraine, to India, to Argentina, to Brazil,
where all the eggs will have been laid in battery cages. Do any of these
countries have a reputation for above average bird welfare standards? Once
this trade starts, it will expand rapidly by virtue of its competitive
advantage. It will be very difficult to stop and it will completely
undermine the efforts of colony egg producers in the UK. In effect we will
export a large slice of our industry, an industry that has just made a
massive investment to stay compliant with EU rules.”
Mr Agnew called for non-compliant member states to
be given temporary derogations on the condition that they “spend their
regional funds on (egg) stamping machines and also to pay for an
inspectorate whose staff are from compliant member states.” He described
this as “the least worst solution” to the crisis created by the
Commission.
Most UK
retailers are keen to avoid trading in battery cage eggs after the
deadline, but they can only succeed in this, if these eggs are properly
identified.”
The full text
of Mr Agnew’s speech is below and a video of it can be viewed at:
Welfare of Laying Hens Debate, Strasbourg 16.12.10
President,
The commission has created a huge crisis in the egg
industry.
Like it or not 100 million birds will be in cages on D
Day. There is neither the cash nor the logistics to prevent this.
The insistence on the ruthless enforcement of its rules in a year’s time,
from the benefit of an armchair, may give the speaker concerned a great
feeling of satisfaction but it could seriously jeopardise the long term
health of the British egg sector.
Let’s look at the practical
implications.
- how do you remove and dispose of 100 million hens
in 24 hours ? -
Or - how do you safely smash and dispose of 83
million eggs each day ?
On the assumption that you somehow succeed
in either of these.....
Where will the consumer turn for their 83
million daily eggs ?
To Ukraine, to India, to Argentina, to Brazil?
Where all the eggs will have been laid in battery cages. Do any of these
countries have a reputation for above average bird welfare standards?
Once this trade starts, it will expand rapidly by virtue of its
competitive advantage.
It will be very difficult to stop.
It will completely undermine the efforts of colony egg producers in the
UK. In effect we will export a large slice of our industry, an industry
that has just made a massive investment to stay compliant with EU rules.
I believe that an intra-community trade ban is a complete non-starter.
Not only will it be impossible to police across open borders, but it could
be challenged by the WTO.
So, the least bad solution is to allow
temporary derogations to non-compliant producers with conditions attached.
There are some naked images I enjoy looking at; but I do not enjoy the
visual image of lorry loads of naked, unstamped eggs leaving foreign
battery cage units en route to the UK in 2012.
Unstamped eggs are a
gift to a fraudulent trader. We have learned this the hard way in the UK.
The UK solution is to mechanically stamp eggs with code numbers
that represent their method of production at the laying farm itself. This
operation is proceeding on my own farm at this very moment. The machinery
is reliable.
The Commission say that it is far too difficult for
them to organise the stamping of a special code number on non-compliant
eggs, despite its obvious necessity.
Yet this is, of course, the
same Commission that is forcing UK sheep farmers to unnecessarily identify
sheep individually with unreliable electronic equipment. What a glaring
inconsistency!
The least bad solution here is for the EU to insist
that non-compliant member states spend their Regional funds on stamping
machines and to also to pay for an inspectorate whose staff are nationals
of compliant member states.
This inspectorate will also visit
packing stations and build up a data base of the processors who use these
battery cage eggs in their products.
Most UK retailers are keen to
avoid trading in battery cage eggs after the deadline, but they can only
succeed in this, if these eggs are properly identified.
Stuart Agnew MEP in the Farming Press
Anger at EU cage ban stance - Farming UK At a recent meeting of the
European Parliament's Agriculture and Rural Development Committee, UKIP
MEP Stuart Agnew clashed with a European Commission ...
The Press Office of The Lord Stoddart of
Swindon
(Independent Labour)
News Release
6th July 2010
Government denies that the European Commission
is the economic government of the UK
In response to a written question from the independent Labour Peer, Lord
Stoddart of Swindon, the Government has denied that the European
Commission is the economic government of the UK (Lords 5.7.10).
Responding for the Government, Lord Sassoon said: For all member states
not in the euro area, including the UK, fiscal and monetary policy
decisions remain a matter for national Governments. The denial follows
a public statement from Commission President Jos Manuel Barroso, in
which he claimed that the Commission is "the economic Government of
Europe".
Lord Stoddart, commenting on the Governments response said: The
Government may think that it is in charge but I believe it is deluding
itself. We are already seeing attempts by the Commission to force the
Government to clear future national budget proposals with them before
discussing it with our Parliament at Westminster. Furthermore, the
European Central Bank has just asked EU finance ministers to consider
changing the Lisbon Treaty in order to impose automatic sanctions
against those countries breaking EU budget rules. The UK would still be
subject to such rules, regardless of our status as a non-eurozone
country.
The full text of Lord Stoddarts written question and the response from
the Government is below:
Hansard 5th July 2010
European Commission
Question
Asked by Lord Stoddart of Swindon
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their response to the statement
by European Union Commission President Jos Manuel Barroso that the
Commission is "the economic Government of Europe".[HL569]
The Commercial Secretary to the Treasury (Lord Sassoon): For all member
states not in the euro area, including the UK, fiscal and monetary
policy decisions remain a matter for national Governments.