UKIP

New Venue for Peterborough Branch Meetings >>> Police Patrols afraid of the dark in Wisbech >>> Robert on Radio talking about the RAF Upwood derelict site >>> WHATEVER IT TAKES ... Terence D. Burch needs and deserves better treatment from the NHS." says, Robert H. Brown NW Cambs Branch of UKIP >>> Robert H Brown now serves on UKIP's Disciplinary Panel >>> A referendum on a new voting system could break apart Britain´s coalition government by the end of May 2011 and still leave us with an unrepresentative parliament, according to UKIP´s David Campbell Bannerman. >>> A quarter of London´s tramps are from EU countries and the number of homeless immigrants is rising, according to new data from the charity, Broadway. >>> Key points of Foreign Secretary William Hague´s speech on Britain´s Foreign Policy in a Networked World have been rebutted by UKIP´s Leading Spokesman, Nigel Farage MEP. >>> British husbands should beware, UKIP MEP Mike Nattrass has warned this week, after French MPs unanimously approved a new bill which could see people jailed for being rude to their partners. >>>
 
UKIP NW Cambs Homepage
Local UKIP Candidates
UKIP Homepage
UKIP NW Cambs News
UKIP NW Cambs Events
UKIP in Europe
UKIP Eastern Counties
UKIP NW Cambs Links
UKIP NW Cambs Photos
UKIP Young Independence
UKIP Manifesto
UKIP Homepage
UKIP Branches in Cambridgeshire
UKIP Contact Us
UKIP NW Cambs Join
UKIP NW Cambs Councillors
UKIP NW Cambs Campaigns
UKIP NW Cambs Letters
UKIP What the EU Costs Us
UKIP NW Cambs Articles
UKIP NW Cambs Archives
Why UKIP
UKIP NW Cambs Videos
Our Shop
 
NWCambs UKIP Blog Site
 
Christian Graves Desecrated During Church To Mosque Conversion
 
The Dubious Duo Cave In Cameron & Conniving Clegg
 
Shoe Bomber Sentence
 
Peer accuses Government of major transfer of sovereignty
 
UKIP Leadership candidates to battle it out in Peterborough
 
UK Households pay more than £500 a year to be EU members
 
A list of Private Members Bills being introduce in the House of Commons
 
Robert H Brown now serves on UKIP's Disciplinary Panel
Upwood & Raveleys Parish Council is currently looking to fill a vacancy
Parish Council vacancy in Girton
By-election is being called for in Cambridge in the ward of Coleridge
UKIP NEC Election Results 2010
 
Improvement in UKIP local by-election results mentioned in the Independent
 
UK Fined for EU flag breaches
 
EAS puts our troops at risk
 
If the CAP doesn't fit, take it off!
 
Europeans claim UK benefits from abroad
 
EU move on EGGS is 'BONKERS'
 
Upwoods opposition to proposed Gypsy site plans.
 
Government confirms Britain's Liability for emergency funding of bail outs for Eurozone countries.
 
Fury as Ken Clarke wants fewer criminals jailed
 
Christian Graves Desecrated During Church To Mosque Conversion

If this doesn't rattle your bones ... nothing will.

THINGS THAT REALLY DO MATTER ...

Shame on Manchester City Council, this is a total outrage.
The planning department at the City Council should of never
given permission to allow these graves to be knocked to pieces
and crushed in such an appaulling and insensitive manner.
Take a look at the new blogsite: http://nwcambsukip.blogspot.com/
Some new every week posted on: "Things That Really Matter..."
 
The Dubious Duo Cave In Cameron & Conniving Clegg

Remember when the sun newspaper asked if Tony Blair was the most dangerous man in Britain.

Should we now be asking if his place has been taken by the Dubious Duo

Cave in Cameron and Conniving Clegg the Dubious duo’s record so far.

Scrap the Harrier, Scrap Ark Royal, Scrap Nimrod.

What is next to be scrapped The British Defence Force?

Can anyone see where this is leading just maybe The European Defence Force?

It is not so much a case of will the last one leaving Britain turn lights off More to the point of will someone turn the lights on and Wake up Britain
 

Shoe Bomber Sentence

 

Remember the guy who got on a plane with a bomb built into his shoe and tried to light it?

Did you know his trial is over?
Did you know he was sentenced?
Did you see/hear any of the judge's comments on TV or Radio?
Didn't think so.!!!

Everyone should hear what the judge had to say.

Ruling by Judge William Young, US District Court.

Prior to sentencing, the Judge asked the defendant if he had anything to say His response: After admitting his guilt to the court for the record, Reid also admitted his 'allegiance to
Osama bin Laden, to Islam, and to the religion of Allah,' defiantly stating, 'I think I will not apologize for my actions,' and told the court 'I am at war with your country.'

Judge Young then delivered the statement quoted below:

Judge Young: 'Mr. Richard C. Reid, hearken now to the sentence the Court imposes upon you.

On counts 1, 5 and 6 the Court sentences you to life in prison in the custody of the United States Attorney General. On counts 2, 3, 4 and 7, the Court sentences you to 20 years in prison on each count, the sentence on each count to run consecutively. (That's 80 years.)

On count 8 the Court sentences you to the mandatory 30 years again, to be served consecutively to the 80 years just imposed. The Court imposes upon you for each of the eight counts a fine of $250,000 that's an aggregate fine of $2 million. The Court accepts the government's recommendation with respect to restitution and orders restitution in the amount of $298.17 to Andre Bousquet and $5,784 to American Airlines.

The Court imposes upon you an $800 special assessment. The Court imposes upon you five years supervised release simply because the law requires it. But the life sentences are real life sentences so I need go no further.

This is the sentence that is provided for by our statutes. It is a fair and just sentence. It is a righteous sentence.

Now, let me explain this to you. We are not afraid of you or any of your terrorist co-conspirators, Mr. Reid. We are Americans. We have been through the fire before. There is too much war talk here and I say that to everyone with the utmost respect. Here in this court, we deal with individuals as individuals and care for individuals as individuals. As human beings, we reach out for justice.

You are not an enemy combatant. You are a terrorist. You are not a soldier in any war. You are a terrorist. To give you that reference, to call you a soldier, gives you far too much stature. Whether the officers of government do it or your attorney does it, or if you think you are a soldier, you are not-----, you are a terrorist. And we do not negotiate with terrorists. We do not meet with terrorists. We do not sign documents with terrorists. We hunt them down one by one and bring them to justice.

So war talk is way out of line in this court You are a big fellow. But you are not that big. You're no warrior. I've known warriors. You are a terrorist. A species of criminal that is guilty of multiple attempted murders. In a very real sense, State Trooper Santiago had it right when you first were taken off that plane and into custody and you wondered where the press and the TV crews were, and he said: 'You're no big deal.'

You are no big deal.

What your able counsel and what the equally able United States attorneys have grappled with and what I have as honestly as I know how tried to grapple with, is why you did something so horrific. What was it that led you here to this courtroom today?

I have listened respectfully to what you have to say. And I ask you to search your heart and ask yourself what sort of unfathomable hate led you to do what you are guilty and admit you are guilty of doing? And, I have an answer for you. It may not satisfy you, but as I search this entire record, it comes as close to understanding as I know.

It seems to me you hate the one thing that to us is most precious. You hate our freedom. Our individual freedom. Our individual freedom to live as we choose, to come and go as we choose, to believe or not believe as we individually choose. Here, in this society, the very wind carries freedom. It carries it everywhere from sea to shining sea. It is because we prize individual freedom so much that you are here in this beautiful courtroom, so that everyone can see, truly see, that justice is administered fairly, individually, and discretely. It is for freedom's sake that your lawyers are striving so vigorously on your behalf, have filed appeals, will go on in their representation of you before other judges.

We Americans are all about freedom. Because we all know that the way we treat you, Mr. Reid, is the measure of our own liberties. Make no mistake though. It is yet true that we will bear any burden; pay any price, to preserve our freedoms. Look around this courtroom. Mark it well. The world is not going to long remember what you or I say here. The day after tomorrow, it will be forgotten, but this, however, will long endure.

Here in this courtroom and courtrooms all across America, the American people will gather to see that justice, individual justice, justice, not war, individual justice is in fact being done. The very President of the United States through his officers will have to come into courtrooms and lay out evidence on which specific matters can be judged and juries of citizens will gather to sit and judge that evidence democratically, to mold and shape and refine our sense of justice.

See that flag, Mr. Reid? That's the flag of the United States of America. That flag will fly there long after this is all forgotten. That flag stands for freedom. And it always will.

Mr. Custody Officer. Stand him down.

So, how much of this Judge's comments did we hear on our TV sets? We need more judges like Judge Young. Pass this around. Everyone should and needs to hear what this fine judge had to say. Powerful words that strike home.

Please SEND this----so that everyone has a chance to read it.

 
 

Peer accuses Government of major transfer of sovereignty after it confirms that the UK cannot withdraw from European Investigation Order ‘directive’

 

THE PRESS OFFICE OF

The Lord Stoddart of Swindon

(Independent Labour)

 

News Release

 

14th October 2010

 

Peer accuses Government of major transfer of sovereignty after it confirms that the UK cannot withdraw from European Investigation Order 'directive'

 

In response to a written question from the independent Labour Peer, Lord Stoddart of Swindon (11th October), the Government has admitted that Britain's participation in the European Investigation Order (EIO), when it gets under way, is a permanent arrangement.  Baroness Neville-Jones, for the Government said:  'The European Investigation Order is not an agreement between national Governments but a draft directive of the European Union.

 

Consequently, as and when agreed, the United Kingdom will be unable to withdraw from the directive.'

 

Lord Stoddart, commenting on the Government's response, was forthright in his criticism:  'Replies to written questions from Parliamentarians are supposed to be supplied within ten working days, this response has taken closer to ten weeks and when I do eventually receive it, the Government confirms that the door has been opened for foreign police forces to be given access to confidential information about British citizens, in perpetuity.

 

Police forces in this country will be compelled to provide details of people's personal affairs, including bank accounts without their knowledge or consent.   Furthermore, our officers will have to carry out investigations and surveillance at the behest of other EU countries.  The Government has over-ridden Parliament so that there has been no discussion in either House on a directive with very serious implications for the British people.  So much for Parliamentary sovereignty!

 

"This is without doubt a major transfer of sovereignty.  What happened to the pre-election promises that any major transfer of sovereignty would be subject to a referendum of the British people?  I am disappointed to find that this new Government is as slippery and dishonest about matters EU as the last one.  No Government of whatever colour should be signing us up to this iniquitous directive."

 

The full text of Lord Stoddart's question and the Government's response is below:

 

EU: European Investigation Order

Hansard 11.10.10

Question Asked by Lord Stoddart of Swindon

 

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Baroness Neville-Jones on 27 July (Official Report, col. 1235) that the European Investigation Order is based on an agreement between national Governments, whether the United Kingdom can withdraw from the agreement at any time.

[HL1916]

 

The Minister of State, Home Office (Baroness Neville-Jones): My answer, to which you refer, states that, "This is mutual legal assistance between national legal regimes".

 

The European Investigation Order is not an agreement between national Governments but a draft directive of the European Union. Consequently, as and when agreed, the United Kingdom will be unable to withdraw from the directive.

 

UKIP Leadership candidates to battle it out in Peterborough as the campaign moves to the East of England

 

The increasingly hard fought campaign for the Leadership of the UK Independence Party moves to the East of England on Sunday (10th October) with a hustings meeting in Peterborough featuring all four of the candidates. Party members will be given a chance to hear about the candidates’ Leadership ambitions and put their questions to them, at the Orton Hall Hotel, The Village, Orton Longueville, Peterborough, PE2 7DN, starting at 1.00pm. The Leadership contest is of special interest for east of England UKIP members as their MEP, David Campbell Bannerman, currently the Party’s Deputy Leader and Head of Policy, is one of the contenders. However, he faces strong competition from former Leader Nigel Farage who is the Party’s most well-known and respected politician, from Tim Congdon, an economist who was an adviser to Margaret Thatcher and from former boxer and enthusiastic promoter of sport for young people, Winston McKenzie.

Further information on the candidates can be found at the following link:

 http://www.ukip.org/page/leadership-contenders

There will be a ballot of all current UKIP members to decide the winner of the contest, with the result being announced on 5th November 2010.

 

UK Households pay more than £500 a year to be EU members

 

More news from the Daily Telegraph ... in today's paper the Telegraph reports on new figures showing that the average British household paid £518 to be a member of the EU last year, but received only £367 back in direct benefits. The £150 loss for every household is because Britain's share of the costs for running the EU are not matched by returned cash, which comes in the form of farm subsidies or social funds. The paper sys the data shows that the lion's share of spending goes to continental farmers and poorer countries such as Poland.

 

A list of Private Members Bills being introduce in the House of Commons

 

There's a list of Private Members Bills being introduce in the House of Commons by the Conservative MP Philip Hollobone which supports are stand. The dates of these can be found www.parliment.uk and www.TheyWorkForYou.com

 

Robert H Brown now serves on UKIP's Disciplinary Panel

 

Just to inform the local membership, I have been appointed to serve on the national UKIP Disciplinary Committee which consists of a ten-strong panel to deal with any difficulties or disputes regarding UKIP members who may come before the panel to consider any particular issue. The appointment is for a period of one year starting as from the 7th of Sept. 2011.

My other role as the Eastern Counties Representative for Cambridgeshire serving as a member on the committee is to find candidates for the next local district & town council elections that will be held in May 2011. In addition to this, I also serve on the sub-committee for the membership & new members which is designed to find ways of increasing our membership here in the Eastern Counties.

 

Upwood & Raveleys Parish Council is currently looking to fill a vacancy

 

The Upwood & Raveleys Parish Council is currently looking to fill a vacancy on it's council due to the sudden death of Mr. John Rignall who had been very ill. If your interested in applying, you must be a local resident and write to the parish council giving your reasons for wanting to serve on the Parish Council. You have until the end of September to apply ...

 

Parish Council vacancy in Girton

 

There's another Parish Council vacancy in Girton which is on the outskirts of Cambridge. Anyone that's interested should contact Joe Webster  ukip@jwebster.plus.com and me at: nwcambsukip@hotmail.co.uk

 

By-election is being called for in Cambridge in the ward of Coleridge

 

Finally, a by-election is being called for in Cambridge in the ward of Coleridge. This is due to the current Conservative City Councillor who has resigned this week, which was announced yesterday on Look East News.

 

UKIP NEC election results

 

The NEC election results have now been declared. With a record 37 candidates for the top 7 spots, the count was a time-consuming one.  The successful seven candidates were:

 
Steve Allison 2,275  
George Curtis 1,849  
Hugh Williams 1,748  
Jill Seymour 1,696  
Michael McGough 1,604  
Elizabeth Burton 1,548  
Julia Reid 1,491  
 

After the count, UKIP Party Chairman Paul Nuttall MEP said: "It was a complicated and time-consuming count for acting returning officer John Knotts and his team of voluteers and on behalf of the Party, I'd like to thank them for their efforts.

 

"I now look forward to seeing the new NEC members at their first meeting next Thursday on the eve of the Party's annual conference in Torquay."

 

The remainder of the full result is reproduced below:

     
Coburn  1,452  
Micklethwait    1,326  
Finch  1,317  
Pain 1,261  
Bours 1,248  
Henke 1,198  
Rowlands 1,191  
Black 1,077  
Daly 1,051  
Mason 958  
Garner 924  
Atkinson 881  
Jones 863  
McKenzie 857  
Harrison 847  
Slaughter 832  
Povey 822  
Moyies 807  
Mackay 789  
Macey 751  
Durrance 749  
McIntyre 694  
Swain 687  
McWhirter 653  
Hookem 634  
Macarthur 559  
Duxbury 500  
Evans 421  
Carter 392  
Dodman 355  
 

Improvement in UKIP local by-election results mentioned in the Independent

The Independent newspaper has commented on strong UKIP by-election results this week:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/double-defeat-for-tories-in-byelections-2063696.html

More detail on these results will follow in the next newsletter.

 

UK Fined for EU flag breaches

Brussels has fined Britain more than 150million for failing to display the EU flag on a string of projects part-funded by Europe.

Read more:

 
EAS puts our troops at risk

Attempts by the new European External Action Service to gain control over military actions runs the risk of costing the lives of British troops, UKIP MEP David Campbell Bannerman warned today.

Read more:

 
If the CAP doesn't fit, take it off!

In a speech to the European Parliament in Strasbourg, Norfolk farmer and UKIP MEP, Stuart Agnew today suggested that plans for the future of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) are likely to "hinder" farmers rather than help them.

Speaking during a debate on a report about the future of the CAP, Mr Agnew pointed out that the plans would divert money away from working farmers and accused the EU of being obsessed with climate change, leading to nonsensical CO2 reduction measures being proposed. "The report's obsession with climate change could lead to the acceptance of advice that obliges arable farmers to pump tractor exhaust under the ground, increasing fuel consumption and spoiling seed beds as a consequence."

Commenting after the debate, Mr Agnew said:"There is no good reason to have the CAP, but if we are compelled to have it, let its focus be on supporting farmers, not on politically correct, pseudo-scientific scares.

"Injecting tractor exhaust fumes underground, and changing ruminant livestock feed to reduce methane emissions will only hinder farmers. At a difficult time for farming, the EU is seeking to increase farming costs, while the likely effect will be to reduce crop yields.

"If the CAP fits, we should wear it. The corollary is that if the CAP doesn't fit, we should take it off!"

I declare an interest as a working farmer.

Plans for the future of the CAP have to work at a practical level and they must be affordable.

The military have a phrase: "no names, no pack drill" but a member of the EPP voted against this report in committee. This can only be because in today's financial climate, cost is a worry and the report's enthusiasm for non-agricultural objectives, under pillar 2, diverts funds away from farmers.

The report's obsession with climate change could lead to accepting advice that obliges arable farmers to pump tractor exhaust under the ground, increasing fuel consumption and spoiling seed beds as a consequence.

My own experience of witnessing contractors attempts to inject dirty water under the ground, to satisfy EU rules tells me what problems lie ahead. Ruminant livestock farmers may be required to reduce methane emissions by replacing hay and silage with more expensive cereal based rations.

If there has to be a CAP, let it assist farmers, not hinder them.

 
Europeans claim UK benefits from abroad

British taxpayers are paying out benefits to disabled East European immigrants who have returned home. Last year more than £5m in UK Disability Living Allowance was sent abroad to 2,000 foreigners.

UKIP’s joint deputy leader David Campbell Bannerman said the figures prove how corrupt the British benefits system is. “We know there is a huge amount of fraud in the system which the Government is trying to deal with. But the only people free from accountability are those, mostly former migrants, who have left these shores and receive these benefits abroad.”

Migrants who move to Britain from EU countries are entitled to claim up to £126 a week after just two years as a resident. And despite George Osborne’s pledges to crack down on fraudulent disability benefits claimants, the government will not be able to check up on those who do not live in the UK.

Matthew Elliott, from the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “Taxpayers will be fuming that we’re forking out for migrants who are back in their own countries. If they have returned then they are the responsibility of their home countries.”

 
EU move on EGGS is 'BONKERS'

A proposed EU ban on selling eggs by the dozen was today described by UKIP as "bonkers".

Britain has been exempt from EU regulations that ban selling goods by number. But last week MEPs voted to end this country's deal despite objections from UK members.

Instead of packaging telling shoppers that a box contains six eggs the new rules mean that it will instead show the weight in grams of the eggs inside, explained UKIP MEP Paul Nuttall.

The rules apply to other food stuffs traditionally sold by quantity, such as bread rolls and fruit and the rules do not allow both weight and quantity to be displayed.

"This is plain bonkers," said Mr Nuttall, MEP for the North West.

"When the French stop selling their wine by the case we'll be happy to stop selling eggs by the dozen," he said.

"And I am also very concerned that the extra cost of changes to packaging and labelling, as well as weighing, will be passed onto shoppers through higher grocery bills.

"The idiot bureaucrats who have dreamed this nonsense up say it will help consumers make an informed choice when buying food. That is rubbish - British shoppers want to buy items the way they always have not the way dictated by a faceless pen pusher in Brussels," said Mr Nuttall.

"This regulation has to be further debated by the European Parliament and you can be very sure that UKIP will be voting against it."

 
UPWOODS OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED GYPSY SITE PLANS.

We had a good turnout to the Public consultation regarding the proposed Gypsy sites in Upwood, a total of 683 people attended. Shailesh Vara MP (Conservative) also attended and spoke to about 200+ gathered for a photo shoot at the Upwood Gliding Club last Friday afternoon giving us his backing. Keith Sisman who's a parish councillor took some photo's which can be viewed at: http://sisman.net/june15.

The last photo on Keith's website shows you just how much I love to wind up the the opposition. (Ha! Ha! Ha!) What a brilliant wind up ... even though I say it myself. They wanted me in the picture, but without my T-Shirt showing.
 
GOVERNMENT CONFIRMS BRITAIN'S LIABILITY FOR EMERGENCY FUNDING OF BAIL OUTS FOR EUROZONE COUNTRIES

News Release from the Press Office of  The Lord Stoddart of Swindon
Contact: Stuart Gulleford 07734-457390 : 11th June 2010

In response to a written question by the Independent Labour Peer, Lord Stoddart of Swindon, the Government has confirmed that Britain will not be participating in the European Financial Stabilisation mechanism, the €500 billion (£413 billion) fund set up to support eurozone member states. The majority of the funding will come from eurozone member states. However, the Government has also confirmed that €60 billion (£49.56 billion) of the total mechanism budget will be 'emergency finance'  raised by the EU in the form of loans and in the event of a default on any loan, Britain would be underwriting approximately 13.6% or €8 billion (£6.6 billion) of the cost.

Lord Stoddart said: "Since the eurozone seems to be heading for a major meltdown, it seems highly likely that both the main fund and the emergency finance will be needed. In the event of the latter, it is just as likely that there will be a default and the British taxpayer will be asked to help bail out eurozone members. No political party has ever sought a mandate for this and, in the final analysis, in cannot be either justified or afforded." Ends

The full text of Lord Stoddart of Swindon's question and the Government's reply is as follows:


EU: Financial Assistance to Member States House of Lords Written answers and statements, 9 June 2010
Photo of Lord Stoddart of Swindon

Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour) To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will ensure that United Kingdom taxpayers will not be required to make financial contributions to eurozone countries which are experiencing financial and economic problems; and, if so, how.
Hansard source (Citation: HL Deb, 9 June 2010, c43W)
Lord Sassoon (Commercial Secretary, HM Treasury; Conservative) EU finance Ministers at an extraordinary meeting of the ECOFIN Council on 9 May agreed to establish a European financial stabilisation mechanism to support euro-area member states, totalling €500 billion.
Up to 440 billion of the sum would be provided by euro-area member states (and others who choose to participate) through a special purpose vehicle. The UK has chosen not to participate in the special purpose vehicle and will not make contributions; and there is, therefore, no question of any liability arising to the UK.
Up to 60 billion of emergency finance could be provided in accordance with Article 122(2) of the Lisbon treaty. Should this element of the mechanism be called upon, the European Commission would raise the money on the capital markets, guaranteed by the EU budget. Loans would be granted in parallel with IMF programmes and would be subject to policy conditionality. Only where there were defaults on loan repayments would there be a cost to the EU budget.
In this circumstance, all member states would be liable for a share through their monthly subscriptions to the EU budget: based on the UK's contribution to the 2010 EU Budget, the UK's share would be approximately 13.6 per cent of any increase, or up to a maximum of around €8 billion. Any increase to the UK's contribution would be within the limits of the EU own resource ceiling already agreed by Parliament through the European Communities (Finance) Act 2008.
 

 
Fury as Ken Clarke wants fewer criminals jailed

Thousands of offenders could be walking the streets in a U-turn on David Cameron’s tough-on-crime promises in a desperate bid to save money - if Ken Clarke has his way.

The Government is proposing a radical reform of prison policy to save £2.2billion by sending fewer offenders to jail and cutting sentences, it emerged yesterday.

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/180874/Fury-as-Ken-Clarke-wants-fewer-criminals-jailed

We say:

The electorate should feel very angry about this latest of U-turns by the ConDem coalition.

The tories promised to be tougher on crime before the election, as soon as they get elected, they do what they do best – and perform a U-turn.

Whether this back-tracking is down to the yellow Lib Dems, or just the fact the tories have a habit of u-turns, (the Lisbon treaty referendum for example) it is further evidence that they cannot be trusted to deliver on their promises.

UKIP are the only party that would add MORE prison places not less.

If anyone deserves preferential treatment, it’s the electorate, not the criminal.

Designed and Search Engineered by SEO-Eastern.Com